Independent Special Prosecutor v. Kisswani (2024): Difference between revisions

From Central Student Government Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older editNewer edit →
VisualWikitext
Administrator (talk | contribs)
Bureaucrats, emailconfirmed, Interface administrators, privatedomains, Administrators
169 edits
m Parikh link formatting
Administrator (talk | contribs)
Bureaucrats, emailconfirmed, Interface administrators, privatedomains, Administrators
169 edits
Infocard
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Infobox CSJ case
{{Infobox CSJ case
| Litigants=Marbury v. Madison
| Litigants=ISP v. Kisswani
| ArgueDate=February 11
| DecideDate=December 1
| ArgueYear=1803
| DecideYear=2024
| DecideDate=February 24
| FullName=[[Aiden Michael Burke]], [[Independent Special Prosecutor]] v. [[Hana Kisswani]]
| DecideYear=1803
| Citation=F-24-059
| FullName=[[William Marbury]] v. [[James Madison]], [[United States Secretary of State|Secretary of State of the United States]]
| Opinion=https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rKNFY5WcEwUEVwPSKmgEl2EIVolFZZYb/view?usp=sharing| Prior=Original action filed in Central Student Judiciary.
| USVol=5
| Majority=Lobbezoo
| USPage=137
| JoinMajority=Farmer, Bidari
| ParallelCitations=1 Cranch 137; 2 [[L. Ed.]] 60; 1803 [[U.S. LEXIS]] 352
| Concurrence=Lobbezoo
| Opinion=http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep005/usrep005137/usrep005137.pdf
| JoinConcurrence=Bidari
| Prior=Original action filed in U.S. Supreme Court; order to show cause why writ of mandamus should not issue, December 1801
| LawsApplied=[[All-Campus Constitution|A.C. Const. art. VIII]]; [[Elections Code |Compiled Code art. IV]] § 7.4.1.2, 7.5.1
| Outcome=Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 is unconstitutional to the extent it purports to enlarge the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court beyond that permitted by the Constitution. Congress cannot pass laws that are contrary to the Constitution, and it is the role of the judiciary to interpret what the Constitution permits.
| Majority=Marshall
| JoinMajority=Paterson, Chase, Washington
| NotParticipating=Cushing and Moore
| LawsApplied=[[Article One of the United States Constitution|U.S. Const. arts. I]], [[Article Three of the United States Constitution|III]]; [[Judiciary Act of 1789]] § 13
| Overturned previous case = [[Parikh v. UEC (2013)|''Parikh v. UEC'' (2013)]]
| Overturned previous case = [[Parikh v. UEC (2013)|''Parikh v. UEC'' (2013)]]
}}
}}

Revision as of 11:06, 5 March 2025

ISP v. Kisswani
Decided December 1, 2024
Full case nameAiden Michael Burke, Independent Special Prosecutor v. Hana Kisswani
CitationsF-24-059
DecisionOpinion
Case history
PriorOriginal action filed in Central Student Judiciary.
Case opinions
MajorityLobbezoo, joined by Farmer, Bidari
ConcurrenceLobbezoo, joined by Bidari
Laws applied
A.C. Const. art. VIII; Compiled Code art. IV § 7.4.1.2, 7.5.1
This case overturned a previous ruling or rulings
Parikh v. UEC (2013)


Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court that established the principle of judicial review, meaning that American courts have the power to strike down laws and statutes they find to violate the Constitution of the United States. Decided in 1803, Marbury is regarded as the single most important decision in American constitutional law.Template:SfnpTemplate:Sfnp It established that the U.S. Constitution is actual law, not just a statement of political principles and ideals. It also helped define the boundary between the constitutionally separate executive and judicial branches of the federal government.

This is some more text just to see what happens. Hopefully this renders well on the mobile version.

This is a test Mario Thaqi.

Retrieved from "https://wiki.csg.umich.edu/index.php?title=Independent_Special_Prosecutor_v._Kisswani_(2024)&oldid=678"