Independent Special Prosecutor v. Kisswani (2024): Difference between revisions
No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| FullName=[[Aiden Burke|Aiden Michael Burke]], [[Independent Special Prosecutor]] v. [[Hana Kisswani]] | | FullName=[[Aiden Burke|Aiden Michael Burke]], [[Independent Special Prosecutor]] v. [[Hana Kisswani]] | ||
| Citation=F-24-059 | | Citation=F-24-059 | ||
| Opinion=https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rKNFY5WcEwUEVwPSKmgEl2EIVolFZZYb/view?usp=sharing| Prior=Original action filed in Central Student Judiciary. | | Opinion=https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rKNFY5WcEwUEVwPSKmgEl2EIVolFZZYb/view?usp=sharing| Prior=Original action filed in the Central Student Judiciary. | ||
| Majority=Lobbezoo | | Majority=Lobbezoo | ||
| JoinMajority=Farmer, Bidari | | JoinMajority=Farmer, Bidari | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
}} | }} | ||
'''''Independent Special Prosecutor v. Kisswani''''', F-24-059 (2024), was a landmark decision of the [[Central Student Judiciary]]. The case concerned [[Hana Kisswani]], a School of Social Work Assembly candidate who accepted a donation from her non-student sister and exceeded CSG’s Campaign Expenditure Limit. The Court held that a rule prohibiting donations from non-students did not apply to candidates' acceptance of such donations, and only prohibited non-students from making donations. More significantly, the Court struck down the Candidate Expenditure Limit as unconstitutional under the Free Speech Clause of the [[All-Campus Constitution]], applying [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strict%20scrutiny strict scrutiny] and partially overturning [[Parikh v. University Elections Commission (2012)|''Parikh v. UEC'' (2012)]]. | '''''Independent Special Prosecutor v. Kisswani''''', F-24-059 (2024), was a landmark decision of the [[Central Student Judiciary]]. The case concerned [[Hana Kisswani]], a School of Social Work Assembly candidate who accepted a donation from her non-student sister and exceeded CSG’s Campaign Expenditure Limit. The Court held that a rule prohibiting donations from non-students did not apply to candidates' acceptance of such donations, and only prohibited non-students from making donations. More significantly, the Court struck down the Candidate Expenditure Limit as unconstitutional under the Free Speech Clause of the [[All-Campus Constitution]], applying [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strict%20scrutiny strict scrutiny] and partially overturning [[Parikh v. University Elections Commission (2012)|''Parikh v. UEC'' (2012)]]. | ||
== Background == | == Background == | ||